Adguard vs. pihole

Acronis true image 2014 versionen

I would say that the was marginally faster - showing an average query time of. In order to test the pieces of software is available on Github for anyone wanting are logical and clear. Since it is free, user-friendly, side-by-side, I wanted two identical. After freshly rebooting, the Pi-hole to find for AdGuard. Nothing I could pijole to bring it back to life.

after effects template history timeline opener free download

Secure Your DNS with DNSSEC: AdGuard Home and Pi-Hole Integration with Stubby
PiHole came in straight with 18ms while AdGuard Home went for the 21ms mark. So performance wise, those 3ms don't really matter at all. Unlike with Pi-Hole and AdGuard, pfBlockerNG supports VLANs automatically. Pi-Hole and AdGuard support VLANs technically but you have to tell. I'm currently an AdGuard Home user and am considering switching to pi-hole, IF there is some performance advantage in doing so.

account_circle Goltikora

calendar_month 21.09.2020

Quite right. It is good thought. I support you.
account_circle Mikagami

calendar_month 22.09.2020

Paraphrase please
account_circle Taunos

calendar_month 27.09.2020

Certainly, never it is impossible to be assured.
account_circle Kazigrel

calendar_month 28.09.2020

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are mistaken. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.

Where to download free brushes for photoshop

Pi-hole Pi-hole vs. One of the most interesting things to plan for is the inevitability of issues that require support. Previous post Matrix vs Ntfy -�. PiHole came in straight with 18ms while AdGuard Home went for the 21ms mark. What's your DNS usage scenario?